Refactoring or Retiring Can be a A Feature

A really good article from Nature lays out why the bias towards additive solutions might be further compounded by the fact that subtractive solutions are also less likely to be appreciated.

In product development, friction points around refactoring and retiring features are widely popular in discussions among the engineers in any organisation. However, the bias towards additive solutions as found out in the article can be a strong root cause.

When business expects all the charts going top right corner, we may be relating this demand to additive solutions unconsciously. I have not seen any success stories at large mentioning why retiring features made their overall KPIs better.

After reading this article, I’ll try to challenge my bias towards additive solutions. It is going to be harder to come up with ideas subtracting by nature.  However, in the grand schema of leaving a better legacy behind us and sustainability, I don’t see myself being challenged with counter arguments.

People tend to solve problems by adding features.

Source: Adding is favoured over subtracting in problem solving

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: